Model adaptivity configuration docs: Clarify micro_file_names#269
Merged
Conversation
IshaanDesai
approved these changes
May 19, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Looking first at the
micro_file_namesconfiguration option, I was confused on whether the order plays any role, since this is a list (not a dictionary). I understand that this is always supposed to be in the order of decreasing model fidelity, considering the return values of theswitching_functionat the bottom of https://precice.org/tooling-micro-manager-model-adaptivity.htmlAlso: is
fidelitymeant as a synonym forresolutionhere? Because theswitching_functionseems to take aresolutionargument.Checklist: